
Published by: SPESFEED cc, PO Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201
| Inside This Issue |
This newsletter comes to you amongst a flurry of activity. I have attended the AFMA symposium at Sun City while Walter was a speaker in the Kanhym/PIC pig road show. In addition Peter Chrystal from NuTec, and I were invited to attend the Alltech Biotechnology symposium in Kentucky, in the USA, as well as to visit Akey Inc., NuTec’s sister company in the US. There is some report back on each of these activities in this edition of the newsletter.
Well-known British consultant John Portsmouth has responded to the article in the last issue regarding the oP system. We carry summaries of his letters and comments in this issue. We would welcome other contributions to the newsletter in this vein.
We have asked Dr Herman Bosman, a consultant veterinarian from the Eastern Cape to contribute to the newsletter on an ongoing basis. His first article appears in this issue.
We would like to welcome Bianca Losper to the SPESFEED ranks. She will be our receptionist as well as being involved with general office administration.
Readership Survey
Thank you to all those of you who filled in the readership survey. We have received 41 replies, which is about a 20% return. I am told that this is quite good for a survey of this nature. We have already made a donation to the Avril Elizabeth Home.
The reason for asking you to help with the survey is so that we can fully appreciate our readers needs. I will give you and overview of some of our findings.
The vast majority of people who filled in the questionnaire (possibly those who did not have another opinion) look forward to receiving this newsletter and indeed read most of it. More than 90% of the respondents have been able to implement some of the ideas and proposals put forward in the newsletter, and indeed even refer back to old issues.
Most people do receive each issue but there have been suggestions that we use email for distribution. We have started doing this for recipients outside South Africa but feel that a hard copy is still the easiest way in which to read a document of this nature.
Less than 20% of our readers have ever visited our web site. This is much as I had suspected and it makes me wonder about the power of internet marketing.
In broad terms our respondents found that the appearance and length of both the newsletter itself and the articles contained in the publication were of about the right length. People also felt that the document was easy to read, used simple language and was not too scientific.
The issues that were of the most importance to us at SPESFEED were should the publication be in colour and if so should we use advertisers to help cover our increased costs. Only 10% of respondents felt that a colour publication was important, while 25% felt that we should not carry any advertising. Some people felt very strongly that we should remain independent at all costs.
Most people felt that the information contained in the document was relevant, up to date and accurate. In broad terms the content would appear to suite most of our readers.
There was a feeling that we should perhaps include more information on feed ingredients, feed additives and marketing. We will endeavour to do so in future, although it may be difficult to include more information on proprietary products.
Whilst we would be happy to carry technical information on feed ingredients, carrying pricing information in a quarterly publication is unrealistic as it will be out of date before it gets there.
The acid test for a publication such as this is always, "would I be prepared to pay for this with my own money?. It is not our intention to ever charge for the newsletter but 65% of respondents felt that they would part with their own money in order to continue to receive the publication. All respondents want to continue to receive the newsletter.
Courses
We have just completed our most successful poultry course to date. We had so many delegates that we had to change venues to accommodate them all. The irony of this move is that the hotel that we changed to went into liquidation the day before the course began and we had to take our meals in the local Thai restaurant.
We still have the following courses scheduled for this year:
| Dairy Nutrition September 11 to 13 | |
| Pig Nutrition September 18 to 20 |
We plan to run the dairy course with the help of Dr Lourens Erasmus this year, as he is up to date on all of the latest information regarding the newly published NRC recommendations for Dairy Cattle.
Please let Christél know if you are interested in attending either course.
Pigs Production Targets
|
Age |
Target |
Good |
Marginal |
|
Days |
Kg |
Kg |
Kg |
56 |
21 |
17 |
16 |
63 |
28 |
23 |
21 |
70 |
34 |
29 |
27 |
77 |
41 |
35 |
33 |
84 |
47 |
41 |
38 |
91 |
54 |
46 |
44 |
98 |
61 |
52 |
49 |
105 |
67 |
58 |
55 |
112 |
74 |
64 |
60 |
119 |
81 |
70 |
66 |
126 |
88 |
76 |
72 |
133 |
94 |
82 |
77 |
140 |
101 |
88 |
83 |
147 |
108 |
95 |
89 |
154 |
115 |
101 |
95 |
161 |
122 |
107 |
100 |
We have recently developed a set of Growth curves for pigs on behalf of PIC and Kanhym estates. These curves are fairly unique as they represent targets that can be expected to be achieved under commercial, rather than experimental conditions. A table containing weekly production information (feed intake and FCR) compliments the curves.
Lysine
BASF is the first company to decipher the genetic information of the bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum and has applied for comprehensive patent protection. This was achieved in co-operation with the biotechnology company Integrated Genomics, Inc., Chicago. The partners have also
determined that the entire metabolism of the bacterium. Corynebacterium glutamicum is of high economic interest as a research object, because it is used by the chemical industry for the biotechnological production of the amino acid lysine, among other things. The substance is employed as a source of protein in animal nutrition. BASF wants to use the new findings on the genetic information and metabolic pathways of the bacterium to make its biotechnological production of lysine even more efficient.
Lysine is one of the essential amino acids in animal nutrition. Lysine produced using biotechnology is added to feed concentrates as a source of protein, and is an alternative to soybeans or meat and bonemeal. In 2000, more than 450,000 metric tons of lysine were sold world-wide, representing a value of about € 660 million. The Fine Chemicals division produces lysine at its Kunsan, Korea, site and is one of the world's biggest three producers.
Rick Kleyn
February saw the holding of the 4th AFMA congress at Sun City. As we have come to expect, the event was well organised and the quality of the speakers was high. A wide range of topics was covered some, of which I will deal with in this short report.
The first session that I attended had to do with the global trends in the feed and raw material markets. Mr David Bossman, the President of the American Feed Industry Association in the USA pointed out that, in future, feed safety and consumer demands would become major forces in the feed industry. Not only will we need to improve our standards, but we will also need to improve the way in which these changes are communicated to the consumer.
Mr Jeanne-Francois Lanclume of André & Cie, Switzerland gave an excellent overview of the international grain industry. He was able to show that despite improvements in yield in South Africa, trends in South America and the US were far greater. He also pointed out that China and the US between them controlled more than half of the world grain market. Erhard Briedenhann from Epol gave an excellent overview of the situation in South Africa for the forthcoming season. In short, maize will be at import parity this season, Soya oilcake prices are softening but this price will largely be determined by the exchange rate, we will have a larger than normal fish catch but prices will stay firm and despite a normal sunflower crop prices will be higher than last season.
During the second session, Dr Wim Verbeke from Belgium discussed how consumerism would impact on livestock products and eventually on the feed industry. These aspects would include food safety issues as well as livestock production methods. Areas of concern are GMP, chain management, traceability transparency and communication.
Dr Kyle Newman from Kentucky in the USA discussed the mechanisms of enzymes in poultry production. These enzymes have been widely used for the last 10 years and future development will likely focus on thermo-tolerant enzyme preparations. He also pointed out that it was imperative that researchers use a standardised method of measuring enzyme activity to improve our understanding of efficacy. Dr Wiernusz of Cobb showed how heat stress impacted on broilers and also discussed the fact that the ME system had it limitations and that we would need to start using some form of NE system in the near future. Dr Tony Marangos of Hy-Line International emphasised that each flock of birds should be treated as an individual and should be catered for accordingly. He was also able to show how important egg size is in the UK in terms of profits, and was amazed to see just how little impact it had in South Africa.
Dr Colin Whitehead of the Roslin Institute gave an update on the vitamin and trace mineral requirements of poultry. Most interesting to me was the very high Vit D requirement of young birds and the fact that some of the Vitamin D metabolites (1,25-D & 25-D) were able to lower the incidence of Tibial Discondroplasia in broilers. In a private meeting we discussed the use of organic selenium in breeder birds and he believes that it is appropriate to use these products in our feeds. He was most emphatic about NOT removing the premix during the withdrawal phase as this reduced the bird’s ability to cope with the stress of catching and shipping. It also reduces the Vitamin levels in the meat.
Dr’s Keith Behnke and Joe Hancock, both of Kansas
Dr Kay Earle of Friskies showed how the emphasis in pet nutrition had moved from simply satisfying the animal nutrient requirements towards a desire to provide optimal nutrition for a variety of life styles and life stages. This will satisfy the owners’ desire to see visibly more healthy pets.
Dr Mike Varley of SC Nutrition (part of the NuTec group), in an excellent presentation on the genetics of lean tissue growth in the pig, was able to show that despite a significant overall improvement in the lean content of pigs over the last 30 years (figures below) there are major breed or strain differences of which the nutritionist must be aware (table).
Growth characteristics for 4 different hybrid products (MLC Stotfold Data)
Company |
J |
K |
L |
M |
Control |
Daily Gain(g) |
841 |
772 |
834 |
804 |
811 |
FCR |
2.53 |
2.84 |
2.68 |
2.67 |
2.69 |
P2 (mm) |
11.2 |
16.2 |
12.8 |
11.9 |
13.1 |
Lean % |
58 |
53 |
56 |
57 |
55 |
Lean Growth (g) |
401 |
318 |
369 |
363 |
348 |
State University both discussed how feed processing had a direct bearing on animal performance. Dr Behnke started by showing us what factors had an impact on pellet quality (figure).
As can be seen formulation (ingredients) have a major impact. Fine grinding will greatly improve pellet quality as will adequate conditioning (at least 30 seconds are required). A thick die improves pellet quality but decreases pallet throughput. He emphasised the fact that it is impossible to measure and improve pellet quality without some form of accurate measurement, such as the tumbling can method. Dr Hancock showed that good pellet quality improved broiler ADG by 6% and FCR by 6 to 7%. When the fine percentage of the diet reaches 50% then it is no better than feeding a meal.
We are all aware that grind has a dramatic impact on growing pigs (see earlier editions of SPESFEED News) but Dr Hancock was able to show just how important this aspect is in sows as well.
Effect of particle size on nutrient metabolism in second parity sows during lactation (After Wondra et al, 1995).
Particle Size, microns |
||||
1200 |
900 |
600 |
400 |
|
DM digestibility % |
82.2 |
85.2 |
85.6 |
88.1 |
N digestibility % |
80.7 |
85.6 |
86.9 |
88.9 |
DE (MJ/kg) |
14.7 |
15.3 |
15.5 |
16.1 |
Feed Intake (kg/day) |
4.19 |
4.24 |
4.40 |
4.43 |
Litter weight (kg) |
34.9 |
36.7 |
38.2 |
38.6 |
The finer grind led to significant improvement in litter weight.
For full details of the AFMA Forum please contact Hansie Bekker at the AFMA offices at 011 803 3128.
Rick Kleyn
John Portsmouth on Available Phosphorus
John Portsmouth has written us three letters in which he makes "further contribution" to Walter’s article in the last newsletter regarding the oP (uptake Phosphorus system).
Breeders:
Hopkinson (1991) established the relationship between potassium and phosphorus in causing Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS), also known as Feed Shock in broiler breeders. Diets low in either or both of these ingredients cause SDS.

John Portsmouth investigated some 50 cases of SDS in breeders, mainly Cobb and Ross under a wide range of climatic, management and environmental conditions. He found that diets needed to meet the specifications as laid out in the table to avoid SDS from occurring.
Nutrient |
Diet Type |
|
Pre-Breeder |
Breeder (Early Lay) |
|
Potassium (%) |
0.65 – 0.7 |
0.65-0.72 |
Av. Phosphorus (%) |
0.40 –0.45 |
0.42-.047 |
Calcium (%) |
<1.65 |
<2.8 |
Protein (%) |
<16 |
<16.5 |
Sodium (%) |
0.14-0.15 |
0.15-0.16 |
Chloride (%) |
0.14-0.20 |
0.15-0.20 |
He has expressed serious doubts that the CVB recommendations, as quoted by Walter, are adequate for the Ross or Cobb and has serious doubts about their adequacy for any strain of bird. He believes that "changes in the way we recommend feeding broiler breeders, i.e. by avoiding too much breast meat development ahead of egg production – certainly reduces the need for very high K and Av.P levels. But even my personal recommendations would not suggest less than 0.40% AV P (or oP) and not less than 0.6% K."
Broilers :
With regards the broiler figures Johns writes as follows. "Whilst the ratio of Ca:oP is in line with most commercial diets i.e. 2.25:1 – 2.3:1. I have great reservations about using such low levels of either mineral but particularly oP. Firstly, whilst "low" levels of calcium can give good growth rate and feed efficiency, caused by better fat utilisation, birds fed such diets develop leg abnormalities particularly under stress conditions which hinder calcium absorption and utilisation.
Diets low in calcium (<0.80%) are one of the causes of Tibial Dischondroplasia and rickets (Riddell & Pass, 1987). Low levels of both Ca and oP can induce rickets due to a reduction in bone ash percentage. The oP requirement will also vary according to the particle size of the calcium supplement, with both fine (100 – 200 mesh) and coarse (12 – 20 mesh) grades reducing both bone ash percentage and weight gain. Both iron and aluminium interfere with phosphorus utilisation. Sooncharenying and Edwards (1990), indicated that practical diets in the USA contained enough iron and aluminium to interfere with phosphorus uptake. The effect of this interaction would be more serious at the low oP levels being recommended by the CVB.
The CVB achieves the primary aim of reducing the amount of P excreted in the litter, but it can put at risk the health of the fast growing meat chicken reared under stressful commercial conditions.
John Portsmouth
Consultant Nutritionist/Technologist
Antimicrobial and Promicrobial Pig Feed Additives
Antimicrobial agents suppress or inhibit the growth of micro-organisms (Cromwell, 2000). This class of compounds includes the antibiotics (naturally occurring substances produced by yeasts, moulds, and other micro-organisms) and the chemotherapeutics (chemically synthesised substances). Currently the FDA has approved 17 antimicrobial agents (12 antibiotics, 5 chemotherapeutics) for use in pig feeds. During 1988 2325tons of antibiotics and chemotherapeutics were used as feed additives in the USA and at present approximately 80 to 90% of the pig starting feeds, 70 to 80% of growing feeds, 50 to 60% of finishing feeds and 40 to 50% of sow feeds contain antimicrobial agents (Cromwell, 2000). These components are well known to increase gains and improve feed efficiency (Kjeldsen, 1997). The benefits result mainly from a reduction in microbial loading in the digestive tract, leading to more nutrient availability for the animal and less substrate for the bacterial organisms to use for their own growth. They furthermore reduce the gut wall thickness thereby increasing nutrient absorption (Hendericks et al. 1981). In the table below the data from 1194 experiments conducted in the USA are summarised to highlight the efficacy of antibiotics (Cromwell, 2000):
Efficacy of Antibiotics as Growth Promoters for Pigs
|
Feeding phase |
Improvement (%) |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
FCR (g/g) |
|
Starting phase (7 - 25 kg) |
16.4 |
6.9 |
Growing phase (17 - 49 kg) |
10.6 |
4.5 |
Growing/finishing phase (24 – 89kg) |
4.2 |
2.2 |
| The benefits from antibiotics as listed in the table above are derived mostly from experiments conducted at research stations. At these stations the facilities are cleaner, the disease load less and the environment less stressful when compared to the commercial farm environment. Antibiotic growth promoters are therefore likely to be even more beneficial when used at farm level. | |
| In addition to growth enhancement, antibiotics have been found to reduce mortality and morbidity. A summary of 67 field trials conducted over a period of 22 years indicates that antibiotics reduced mortality by one half (from 4.3 to 2%) in young pigs (Maddock, 1985). | |
| Antibiotics have also been found to be quite effective when fed during certain stages of the reproductive cycle. A summary of nine studies involving 1931 sows shows that feeding a high level of antibiotic (0.5 to 1g/sow daily) at the time of breeding (1 week before to 2 to 3 weeks after breeding) improves conception rate by about 7 percentage points and improves litter size by nearly one half of a pig at the subsequent farrowing (Cromwell, 2000). | |
| Economic benefits of antimicrobials: Based on average figures Cromwell (2000) calculated that the total benefit from antimicrobial usage is currently as much as $3.93 per marketed pig (more than R30/pig). |
Copper: Using high level of added copper in feed (200 to 250 ppm) results in similar benefits to antibiotics. The table below shows the benefits of feeding high Copper in 23 experiments (starter phase) and 18 experiments (grower/finishing phase) (Cromwell, 2000).
Efficacy of Copper Sulphate as Growth Promoter for Pigs
|
Feeding phase |
Improvement (%) |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
FCR (g/g) |
|
Starting phase (8 – 20 kg) |
11.9 |
4.5 |
Growing phase (18 – 56 kg) |
6.9 |
3.6 |
Growing/finishing phase (18 – 93kg) |
3.1 |
2.5 |
| The responses to copper and antibiotics are additive in young pigs. Copper is therefore efficacious in both the presence and absence of antibiotics. | |
| 200 to 250 ppm copper seems to be the most efficacious level. Adding 100 to 125 ppm copper results in about 75% of the maximum response (Cromwell et al., 1989). | |
| Copper makes the carcass fat more unsaturated and thereby softer (Pettigrew 1999). Over 10 experiments the mean reduction in the melting point of backfat was 6.2 C. |
Zinc Oxide: High levels of dietary zinc oxide (3kg per ton) have been found to reduce preweaning diarrhoea (Kulwich ET al., 1953) and to improve performance. The table below shows the summary of 12 experiments involving 1356 pigs initially averaging 6.55kg and 22.2 days of age (Hill et al., 2000).
Efficacy of Zinc Oxide and Copper Sulphate as Growth Promoters for Weaners
|
Treatment |
Improvement (%) |
|
|
ADG (g/d) |
FCR (g/g) |
|
Zinc Oxide (@3000 ppm) |
13.5 |
4.1 |
Copper Sulfate (@250 ppm) |
10.8 |
4.1 |
| Zinc and Copper are not additive in terms of growth promotion when added in combination to diets for young pigs (Hill et al., 2000). | |
| Both additives improved the faecal firmness somewhat (by 0.25 on a 5 point scoring index from very firm to very watery). | |
| Copper has a marked effect on faecal colour – making it darker by 1.2 points on a 5 point scoring index from yellow to black). |
Promicrobial agents (formally called probiotics – now called direct-fed microbials) are live naturally occurring micro-organisms that are thought to improve the intestinal microbial balance of host animals. The sterile digestive tract of new-born pigs rapidly becomes naturally colonised by a variety of micro-organisms as the pigs are exposed to an environment. Under health and nonstress conditions, beneficial micro floras colonise gut surfaces in symbiotic relationship with the host, and undesirable microbes are suppressed.
The responses to promicrobials are less consistent than is the case with antimicrobial agents. A summary of 26 experiments by Nousiainen and Setala (1993) showed positive growth responses to promicrobials in 16 trials (two were significant at P < 0.05) and negative growth responses in 9 trials (two were significant at P < 0.05). Despite the lack of consistent responses to promicrobials in controlled experiments, there are claims that the responses are more consistent under field conditions. In the USA 42 different micro-organisms are presently approved for use as direct-fed microbials (AAFCO, 2000).
Miscellaneous Agents: A few other organic compounds have been found to alter the resident micro-organisms in the gut. Examples of these are mannan-oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides. Growth promoting responses are inconsistent and less than those obtained with anti microbials. Organic acids have been shown to improve post-weaning performance (ADG improved by 4.5% and feed efficiency by 7% over 10 experiments).
Conclusion:
The traditional antimicrobials are well researched and consistent responses are obtained. The calculation of the payback is therefore very easy. The payback is highest during the starter phase (up to 30:1) and lowest during the finisher phase (as low as 2:1). Copper sulphate remains the promotant with the highest payback.
Walter Scharlach
In the week before Easter Peter Chrystal and I made a flying visit to the USA to attend the Alltech symposium, entitled "Science and Technology in The Feed Industry", and to visit NuTec’s American sister company called Akey.
The Alltech conference is by far the best-organised event of this nature that I have attended, despite the fact that time keeping was poor and program changes were sprung on us. The event started on the Sunday morning with a poultry interest group workshop. The idea was a very good one, but the group was a little too large for there to be any meaningful debate. A number of very interesting points were raised however. Firstly, selenium is essential for sperm motility in broiler breeder males, either in the organic or inorganic form. Unfortunately the work presented did not show the effect of level higher than 0.2 ppm in the diets.
South African, Dr Simon Shane gave an excellent overview of the US broiler industry’s number 1 problem at the moment, necrotic enteritis. He also expressed a very strong view that one should not draw results from trials, field or otherwise, if experiments were not properly replicated and did not contain both a positive and negative control.
After lunch we were bussed to Alltech production and laboratory facilities. These are wonderfully equipped and clean, so much so that most people asked what the place looked like on a Friday after a long hard week.
The technical session of the conference was very intense with a good spread of papers and workshops being presented. All of the data covered during the technical session is covered in the proceedings of the symposium so I do not intend to cover them in much detail here.
Harter-Dennis, Timmons and Driver presented a paper on the effects of application and side activities (other enzymes) on the efficacy of phytaze in broiler diets. They reported that even if they only offered phytaze to broilers on every second day, performance was still normal. In addition they were able to show better performance in birds fed phytaze rather than supplemental inorganic phosphorus.
They were also able to demonstrate that broilers did very well on diets containing as little as 0.2% Av. Phos plus phytaze (see John Portsmouth’s letter).
The workshops are not dealt with in detail. Dr Richard of the Cranfield School of Management conducted the first workshop. The first question he asked when he had finished talking was "Are all Englishmen so radical?" This surprised both the speaker and me because I found his presentation both logical and his prediction probable. He believes that EU governments will be forced to remove both tariff walls and export subsidies that have shielded farmers from the full force of globilsation in the past. In the future huge investments will be required to develop new products, new processes and the new technologies that will be required to stay competitive.
Jim Bannerman talked about the way in which the US ethanol industry was set to undergo huge expansion. One ton of maize will yield 400 litres of ethanol and 300 kg of waste distillers dried grains (DDG) containing about 30% protein. Perhaps the most interesting fact is that currently 7% of the US maize crop is used for ethanol production but that this is likely to increase to 21%.
Prof Dave Downey of Perdue University gave a very rapid overview of selling into the agricultural sector. His University offers a degree in agricultural selling and he informed us that these graduates had the least problem of all departments when it came to finding work on graduation.
Our visit to Akey was of great interest. Akey is a premix company but sells consultations together with its premixes. In addition, they also manufacture speciality products such as milk replacers and baby pig diets. If you buy a "nutritional product" from Akey the margin is increased to cover their consultancy service and the client then has access to any one of 14 nutritionists (all with PhD’s). Some of you may remember Neil Patton a Natal graduate who used to work for Elanco. He has just finished his PhD at the University of Kentucky and has joined Akey as their newest nutritionist.
Akey measures their business in Complete Feed Equivalents (CFE) and currently produce 8 mil CFE’s per year. 60% of their turn over is pig business, but they also provide nutritional products for somewhere in the region of 24 million laying hens as well.
A pig farmer called Carl Akey (who passed away last year) founded the company. He was disappointed with the results that he was achieving in his pigs, when using bought in feed, and set about remedying the problem. He had a very simple business philosophy. In his business the most important component is the animal that is being fed. The producer and then the feed miller follow this. Akey simply holds the umbrella over the whole nutritional undertaking.
When talking about more specific issues to the Akey poultry nutrition team we found that they were as concerned as us about the protein and energy levels to be used in the matrix when using phytaze. Phosphorus specifications are also an issue for them.
The Akey Mill is, as one would expect, large with a number of mixing lines. They use very interesting drum mixers which work a bit like a cement mixer but which are ideal for mixing premixes. I was surprised at just how little process control (computers) they have in their plant; rather they rely on the skilled and experienced work force for quality control.
For those of you who like heavy metal, Akey run a fleet of 45 Kenworth rigs. Each driver is assigned to a vehicle and they are replaced every 1 000 000 miles. Their preventative maintenance program involves servicing each vehicle every second week and they hardly ever have a major breakdown.
Rick Kleyn
Gut Health – Key Factor for Broiler Performance
Introduction
The main purpose of the broiler producer is to convert one form of protein into another. A key factor in this conversion is the integrity of the intestinal track. Absorption of nutrients is an active process and if there is damage to this system then the conversion process is compromised. The ability to absorb nutrients efficiently can be regarded as the first limiting factor in broiler nutrition, not energy or lysine.
Structure of the intestinal tract for absorption
In all systems of the body there is a close relationship between structure and function and in the intestinal tract we find villi (those are finger-like projections into the lumen of the tract) and the purpose of these structures is to enlarge the absorption of the intestinal tract. On the villi we find brush-like structures called microvilli, they enhance the absorption surface even further. This design is highly effective; it improves the absorption surface by almost 200% without making the intestinal tract any longer.
Development of the intestinal tract.
The broilers quadruple its weight in the first seven days, figure 1 shows that the development of the intestinal tract does not develop at the same pace. It is therefore of particular importance to protect the intestinal tract in the young broiler.
Figure 1
Influence of the microbiological environment on the gut.
In modern intensive broiler production there are two systems of the broiler under pressure namely the respiratory system and the digestive system. Both these systems are open to the environment around them and the microbiological flora that is found in the intestinal tract is merely a reflection of the microbiological environment in which the bird is reared.
Figure 2
Demonstrates the decline in broiler growth during the first seven days when they where sequentially placed on the same litter that had been contaminated after the control group had been reared.
Figure 2 Effect of microbiological contamination on early growth.
The control group represents the result obtained when birds are reared in a clean environment. After the control group had been reared the facilities were then contaminated and three cycles of birds were placed without cleaning in-between placements.
Microorganisms affect the intestinal tract in various ways, viruses invade the epithelial cells of the villi and result in necrosis (dying off) of these structures and the absorption surface is reduced by 30-60%. Bacteria compete with the broiler for nutrients as they also use amino acids and other nutrients, some reports state that they can consume up to 8% of the broilers nutrients. The more important effect of bacteria is the production of toxins, the Clostridium group of bacteria is well known for their powerful toxins. These toxins can lead to necrosis of cells as in the case of Clostridium but can also interfere with absorption and lead to increased peristalsis.
Conclusion
Broiler production is going to become an increasingly demanding business, the fast growing bird will need a very specific microbiological environment in the gut and the consumer will insist that that environment is not chemically assisted with the use of antibiotics.
Dr. Herman Bosman
Consultant Poultry Veterinary Surgeon
Tel (041) 955-5442
|
SPESFEED cc |
|
Animal Nutrition Consultants SPESFEED NEWS is published by the consultants at SPESFEED cc. The purpose of the newsletter is two fold. It serves both as a source of information for those involved in animal agriculture as well as a means for us to maintain contact with out clients.SPESFEED provides a professional technical service to the livestock and animal feed industries. Our aim is to ensure that our clients use optimal production and feeding systems in order to maximise the return on investment. The company has no affiliation to any particular product or supplier. |