
Nutrition of the pig from 12 weeks to marketing
by Walter Scharlach
Since 75% of the total feed used on a pig farm is consumed in the grower-finisher phase, nutritional accuracy in this phase has a substantial economic impact. Traditionally very little attention is paid to growing/finishing pigs mainly because of a lack of appropriate record keeping. As better record keeping systems and performance monitoring systems become available, and as potential improvements in profitability become more apparent, more attention is paid to the feeder herd. The variation of more than 25% in feed costs among farms is proof that major savings can be achieved in this area.
Targets for the feeder herd:
The establishment of production targets is important. According to Gadd 1996 "Top third" producers on ad lib feeding are now achieving the standards as shown in table 1:
Table 1: Slaughter pig target standards for 1997 (Gadd, 1996)
|
Growing/Finishing Phase |
30 to 100 kg |
|
ADG (g per pig per day) |
929 |
|
Food Eaten (kg/pig) |
172 |
|
FCR |
2.46:1 |
|
Liveweight per ton of feed (kg) |
407 |
|
Saleable meat per ton of feed (kg) |
301 |
These targets should be used as guidelines. The overall objective is to maximize profit and establish farm specific goals for your operation. Once the goals have been established the feeding and management strategies must be developed which make the achievement of these goals possible.
On most farms, expensive dry feeds are used and it becomes very important to achieve a good feed efficiency. Efficiency is maximized when the greatest proportion of the feed energy is directed to lean growth rather than to maintenance or fat deposition. This is achieved by increasing the feed intake as far as possible above which is required for maintenance, within the range of acceptable carcass quality. Figure 1 illustrates how nutrients which are supplied in excess of maintenance can be used to support growth, either in the form of lean tissue or body fat.
Figure 1: Relationship between feed intake and tissue accretion rates in growing pigs.

The steps needed to formulate farm specific diets accuratly, are as follows:
| Determine the pigs protein deposition. | |
| Use this information to calculate the target nutrient intakes. | |
| Determine the feed intake. | |
| Feeds which will satisfy the pig’s daily energy and lysine needs, at the observed feed intake must be formulated. Ensure the adequate balance between amino acids and include adequate levels of macro minerals, vitamins and trace minerals. | |
| Feed the newly formulated diets and continue to evaluate pig performance. If the desired levels of performance are not achieved, re-evaluate diet formulation and management practices. |
Protein deposition rate:
The protein deposition rate determines the genetic merit of the pig. The effect of increasing the protein deposition rate is shown in table 2 below:
Table 2. Effect of improving genetic potential on performance and profitability of finishing pigs (carcass weight 67.5 kg) (NuTec growth model).
|
Genetic Potential |
Average |
Good |
Excellent |
||
|
PDR* max (g/day) |
130 |
140 |
150 |
160 |
170 |
|
Lean Growth (g/day) |
565 |
610 |
650 |
695 |
740 |
|
Fat Growth (g/day) |
200 |
195 |
175 |
172 |
172 |
|
Growth rate (g/day) |
845 |
890 |
915 |
970 |
1010 |
|
Feed conversion ratio |
2.70 |
2.58 |
2.47 |
2.38 |
2.30 |
|
P2 backfat (mm) |
12.2 |
11.3 |
10.6 |
10.0 |
9.5 |
|
Margin (R/pig) |
32 |
40 |
48 |
55 |
62 |
*PDR = Protein Deposition Rate
The protein deposition potential should be supplied by the breeding company. It may also be estimated from the fat-free lean gain. With this method the fat free lean percentage is obtained from the processor. The fat-free lean gain is calculated by subtracting the estimated fat-free lean at the initial weight, from the fat-free lean at processing and dividing this by the growing days (NPPC, 1991):
Lean gain/day = Carcass muscle - Initial muscle*
Growing days
* Initial muscle (kg) = (0.428 x initial live weight)-1.66
If the fat-free lean gain is calculated, the current productivity of the herd is measured without knowing what the potential performance limit is. Under these conditions, nutrient levels should be set somewhat above those that support current performance levels. As new diets are fed, performance levels should be measured. If performance improves, nutrient levels can be adjusted progressively upward until the optimal level of performance is achieved.
Target nutrient intakes:
Once the pigs’ protein deposition capacity has been determined target nutrient intakes should be calculated. This is shown in table 3 below:
Table 3: Target nutrient intakes to achieve a low (600 g per day), average (800 g per day) and a high growth rate (1000 g per day) (Gadd, 1996)
|
Production Targets |
|||
|
ADG (g/d) |
1000 |
800 |
600 |
|
Backfat depth (mm) |
10 |
12 |
14 |
|
Predicted requirements and performance |
|||
|
Lysine intake (g/d) |
26 |
20 |
15 |
|
Digestible energy intake (MJ/d) |
29 |
27 |
24 |
|
Lysine/DE (g/MJ) |
0.9 |
0.75 |
0.64 |
|
FCR prediction (kg/kg) |
2.4 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
Top
Feed intake:
In order to translate these target nutrient intakes into dietary specifications an estimate of feed intake is needed. Feed intake can be determined by measuring feed intake on a subsamle of pigs in a pen. It is recommended that feed consumption is measured for a 2-week period from at least 2 feeders during the different weight periods. Commercial feed disappearance can also be estimated by using the following formula:
Average daily feed disappearance = Total feed used
Pig days
Figure 2: Standard feed intake curve (90% of the NRC ‘87) compared to typical intakes observed on South African pig farms.

Feed intake is very often determined by a physical feed intake capacity or "gut fill". This means that pigs often reduce their energy intake if presented by low energy feed. Feed intakes vary considerably between different pigs farms. In table 4 the commercial estimate of feed intake on 10 farms is compared to the NCR estimate. The low intake is the average of 8 farms while the high intake reprsents the average of 2 farms.
Table 4: A comparison between the NCR intake prediction and the estimated feed intake on 10 commercial farms. The low intake is the average of the lowest 8 and the high is the average of the highest 2 commercial intakes.
|
|
Commercial data |
|||
|
Weight range |
90% of NCR |
Low |
High |
|
|
30 to 50 kg |
1.80 |
1.60* |
1.78* |
|
|
50 to 70 kg |
2.44 |
2.12* |
2.42* |
|
|
60 to 100 kg |
2.88 |
2.50* |
2.85* |
|
|
Overall |
2.40 |
2.08 |
2.37 |
|
|
Difference to NRC |
- |
(14%) |
(1%) |
|
* Estimated intakes from overall feed usage
Feed formulation:
Once the animals’ nutrient targets are defined and the feed intake curve is known, the diets can be formulated. The lean growth of pigs is driven by energy intake and limited by the animals’ genetic ability to deposit protein. In young growing animals the capacity to consume is normally too low to reach the maximum lean meat deposition. The inclusion of ingredients that dilute the energy content should be avoided. On farms with low feed intakes, growth may be limited by an energy deficiency throughout the growing cycle.
Finishing pigs, on the other hand, may consume more energy than what is needed for maximum lean meat deposition, particularly those with poor lean growth potentials. These animals may deposit excessive amounts of fat. On these farms, lower density diets may be used successfully. The interaction between intake and diet density is shown in table 5.
Table 5: Predicted interaction between diet density and feed intake on the performance of pigs during the finishing phase (65 to 95 kg). Source: NuTec growth model.
|
Formulation (kg) |
Low |
High |
||
|
Maize |
600 |
700 |
||
|
Soya cake 42% |
200 |
250 |
||
|
Wheaten Bran |
160 |
- |
||
|
Premix |
40 |
50 |
||
|
Level of intake (kg/day) |
High |
Low |
High |
Low |
|
Feed intake (kg/day) |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
|
DE intake (MJ/day) |
36.6 |
32.6 |
38.8 |
34.6 |
|
Dig lys intake (g/day) |
19.5 |
17.4 |
22.0 |
19.6 |
|
ADG (g/day) |
950 |
710 |
970 |
870 |
|
FCR (kg/kg) |
2.94 |
3.52 |
2.89 |
2.87 |
|
Margin per kg (R/kg) |
1.98 |
1.13 |
1.83 |
1.65 |
Table 5 shows the following:
| Where feed intakes are sufficiently high pigs will grow fast and convert well. | |
| Where energy limits lean growth, the biggest penalty is the loss of salable meat. |
| In this case, energy is the first limiting nutrient and a shortage of 1.38 MJ DE/ day (100 g of feed) will reduce the growth rate by approximately 83 g per pig per day (NuTec growth model). | |
| A high energy feed should be used to maximize the total energy intake. | |
| There is a fixed relationship between energy intake and body protein deposition. Use the calculated lysine to energy ratios over a range of feed intakes. |
| If the diet is balanced adequately, the protein deposition is limited by the pig’s genetic potential. | |
| The biggest penalty for this scenario, is reduced carcass value. | |
| To prevent poor grading pigs must either be fed restrictively or the dietary energy concentration should be reduced. | |
| There is no relationship between energy intake and body protein deposition and therefore no energy to protein ratio. | |
| Lysine intake targets should be maintained. If the feed intake is reduced (i.e. during the summer months), a higher lysine level should be fed to maintain target intakes. |
Evaluate performance:
Once the correct feeding regime has been selected, it must be maintained. Performance must be monitored to see if goals are being achieved. If goals are consistently not being achieved, solutions to existing problems must be found. If goals are being met, they should be re-evaluated and new ones set.