Spring 2000

 

Published by: SPESFEED cc, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201

 

Inside This Issue

General News

Creating a demanding customer

Rick Kleyn’s trip to the USA and Canada

Excerpts from the Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Seasonal Infertility in Sows Feeding

Phytase Update

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General News

 

The reduced maize price has given our industry buoyancy that it has not had for a while. The pork and broiler industries are particularly upbeat at the moment while the egg industry is still languishing in a low price oversupply situation. Unfortunately the price of maize is firming on the back of a weak Rand and the price of many of our protein sources have increased as well. At the time of writing the foot and mouth situation in Natal has not resolved itself. This is obviously cause for concern.

I have recently had occasion to page through the back issue of the Journal of Applied Poultry Research. In the process I have found a host of forgotten (or never read) articles that are very relevant. I have included some of the findings from these papers in this newsletter.

In our last newsletter we reported on a trial that tested the phosphorus availability of Biofos 21. We have had some objections to the statement that "Biofos 21 can therefore be considered as good a phosphate source for poultry as any other on the market". We apologise for this unscientific comment and for any offence that it may have caused. What this sentence should have said is that the phosphorus availability of Biofos 21 did not differ significantly from the material it was tested against.

I spent some time with Rob Gous at the University of Natal’s research farm in September. It was very encouraging to see just how the farm has developed in the last 10 years, despite budgetary constraints that are far more severe than those seen in the US and Canada (see my article on my visit). New facilities include two controlled environmental broiler houses, a bank of cages for younger broilers (replacing battery brooders), a new feed mill, a new piggery and new broiler breeder facilities. The package is rounded off by technical support from Dudley Tutt and his skilled team. Rob is using the facilities to their best advantage and is probably doing more research now than at any other time in his career.

Top

SPESMIX

As mentioned in an earlier newsletter, changes in computer operating systems and user preferences may well spell the end of the SPESFEED Feed Formulation system. We do not have the skills or the time to migrate the SPESFEED program to Windows. For this reason we have approached FORMAT INTERNATIONAL for help, and together we will be marketing a new Windows based feed formulation program called SPESMIX.

Those who know the Format system will find that SPESMIX looks and feels like FORMAT NC’s Single-Mix package. It has full Format and Windows functionality at the Single-Mix level. There are a number of restrictions though. SPESMIX will only handle 13 time periods, 50 raw materials and 50 products. The cost of the program will be US$ 1000.00 (R 7500.00). An annual support fee of R 1500.00 will be available, which will entitle the user to free upgrades as well as support.

 

Courses

We have just completed another successful pig nutrition course with 22 people from various branches of industry attending. It was particularly good to have a large number of producers on the course.

We have made some provisional dates for next year’s courses. The first course that we will hold will be in conjunction with Format International and will in essence be an introduction to feed formulation. This will take place on 30 and 31 of January. The poultry course will be held from March 27 to 29, the Dairy course in June and the pig course next September. Our venue at the Country Club is in the process of being rebuilt so we should have good new facilities by next year.

Top

The Internet and B2B

Perhaps the phrase B2B does not mean a lot to you, but it is the latest buzzword in cyberspeak. What it stands for is Business to business trade over the Internet. Before the crash of the tech stock NASDEC index earlier this year, investors all wanted a piece of the action, and needless to say, now people are very wary of them.

In a recent article, Jesse Berst of ZD publishing, makes the point that B2B transactions will grow from $336 billion this year to $6.3 trillion by 2005. In addition, the costs of doing business could be reduced by between 2 and 17%, depending on the industry involved.

He goes on to point out that the greatest use of B2B in the future will occur in the following sectors:

Those who sell fungible goods (goods that are easily exchangeable or substitutable).
Perishable goods, such as food, or other goods that benefit from being moved very quickly.
Industries that are now fragmented or inefficient and would benefit from a more common market.

I am convinced that there is huge potential for this technology in animal agriculture both for those who deal in commodities and for those selling their own products. We will all be buying and selling over the Internet shortly.

 

Books

We still have a few copies of Leeson and Summers newest book entitled "Broiler Breeder Production" left. Should you want a copy please let us know?

 

AFMA Forum 2001

This is just a reminder that the Fourth International Congress for the Animal Feed Industry will be held at Sun City from 21 – 23 February next year. A good number of respected international speakers will be delivering papers. Should you be interested in attending please contact AFMA at + 27 11 803 3128.

 

Rick Kleyn

Top

Creating a Demanding Customer

 

Here is the second part of Mike Statchew of Format International’s article on creating a demanding customer, which in turn builds customer loyalty. Although written with a computer software bias, what is said is of relevance to each and every person involved in the business of selling something.

Educate the Customer! Yes I said educate the customer! A more educated customer is a better customer, and is the worst nightmare for your competition. Now to make sure we are all talking about the same thing, when I say educate, I'm not saying "bash" the competition, I'm saying actually educate the customer... Educate them on what?? Well here's a few items that come to mind:

  1. About your product line. Let them know about the total product line, and what it can do for them.
  2. About your competitors product line... the more you can show/tell your customer about the competitors product, the more your customers (or prospects for that matter) will come to realize that you know about the products available and why your products are best for them.
  3. About the business they are in. it doesn't matter if they are feed millers, feed lot operators, or consulting nutritionists, educating them about the business they are in, and yes how your products can assist them in that line of business will go a long way. For example, on our website (www.formatinternational.com) we now have a section called Scientist to Scientist, which will slowly become a resting place for scientific information about the feed industry, For starters we have been provided some articles on poultry and ratite nutrition, which can be provided to our customers. I would hope that a whole series of articles on nutrition, feeding, distribution, and mill management would be very useful to our existing customers, while also being very useful tools to be used in selling prospects.
  4. Educate on the underlying technology utilized in our product line. For example, why is it so important to have our software be based on Windows 98/NT/2000 technology and not MS-Dos based??? Its not that we are "Windows bigots", its that Windows NT and 2000 will have serious problems running MS-Dos based applications, and that even if they do run, they probably will not be able to talk to the printers, LAN drives, and definitely not the Internet for updates and upgrades.... Also, as we progress we all know that integration with the Internet is becoming a business requirement.... MS-Dos doesn’t integrate with the web at all.
  5. Educate what we do different than the competition, and make sure the customer knows why.... It is you opportunity to stand out. Educating the customer is one of the re-enforcing methods to make and keep a demanding customer...

Can you imagine your well educated customer interrogating a salesperson from the competition on why they don't have web based support, or why they are continuing to stick to MS-Dos based software, or why all the competitive salesperson knows about your products... is that they exist and not what/how they work???? I surely would not want to be that salesperson!

In closing, educating the customer is a method of reinforcing to the customer why they made the right choice to do business with you....

As always, if you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me

 

Dr. Michael A. Stachiw

Format International

Top

 

Rick Kleyn's Trip to the USA and Canada

 

August saw my family and I in North America. After an overdose of Mickey Mouse we spent 4 days with Nick Dale and his family in their beautiful log home in the forests of Georgia. I was happy to be able to tag along with Nick on his rounds of the University, research facilities and farms.

To say that I was impressed with what I saw would be an understatement. The University of Georgia has a huge Poultry Science department and an equally large Avian Medicine department at the veterinary school. It lies at the centre of the largest concentration of poultry in the USA and funding levels at the University are good.

Although Nick Dale is a Professor in the Department, his role at the University, and indeed the State as a whole is that of extension specialist. He has some post graduate students but is not a "lecturer" in the normal sense of the work. He is however an active research worker. The system as it exists is probably a model of how an extension service should operate in the poultry industry. A high level of technical expertise has been established, research facilities are available to test any new product or solve any problems and the people employed as extension specialists exist for the sole reason of ensuring that the information gets through to the producers.

There were many interesting things that I saw and did whilst with Nick, some of which I will describe below.

Our first visit was to Southern Poultry Research Inc. This research facility is owned by Dr Greg Mathis and is used mostly by pharmaceutical companies to test their drugs for registration purposes. He has a small feed mill and a number of houses in which he does both broiler and turkey work.

We then moved on to the Gainsville GA branch of Cal-Maine foods, who are the largest egg producers in the US. Here we had a meeting with the nutritionist. Apart from being introduced to fried green tomatoes, I found that they are doing pretty much what we are doing in terms of nutrition. It was interesting that he had found that Phytaze had saved him US$ 2.00 per ton, a figure that matches our own savings closely.

The huge number of broilers being slaughtered in Georgia lead to a lot of waste product. Nick took me to visit Ampro Products, Inc who is a specialist rendering company. They produce poultry by-product meals unlike anything we see in our part of the world. Poultry blood, carcasses and feathers all go into separate products. These products are consistent in their nutrient analysis and have amino acid digestibility similar to fishmeal.

The University Research farm is truly impressive. They have a large number of broiler, breeder and layer houses. In addition to a well-equipped feed mill, they also have just completed a modern broiler processing plant, similar to those used in industry.

We moved on from Georgia to Guelph (Ontario) in Canada where we were hosted by Steve and Anne Leeson. They too live in the country and we all thoroughly enjoyed the Canadian woods, bird life and mosquitoes. I was again able to spend some time with Steve both on the University research farm and on a commercial farm.

Although the faculty at Guelph is not quite as big as that of Georgia it is no less impressive and the amount of research being done is truly impressive. I saw everything from trans-genic chickens to feed trials in the University’s controlled environment facilities.

The poultry industry in Canada is probably unique in that production control through a quota or permit system exists. A permit for a single laying hen changes hands at around Canadian $ 100.00 (R500.00) and that for a single broiler place at $40.00.

Producers expect to make in excess of $10.00 per laying hen per year, and one broiler producer we visited was making about 45 Canadian cents profit per kg of broiler sold. I was interested to see three story broiler houses. They are cheaper to build and to keep warm than single story structures.

 

A typical three story broiler house in Ontario, Canada

The layer operation that I visited looked similar to any high rise house in South Africa apart from the fact that the birds that were being used were white egg producers. What I did see that caught my eye was that each fluorescent globe had a transparent, red, plastic sheath around it. The farm manager told us that this had a major influence on calming the birds in the house down.

It was also very interesting to see that the Ontario Department of Agriculture and the University of Guelph work very closely together. The department has its offices on the University campus and the University conducts all agricultural research on behalf of the state. This has lead to the concentration of skills and resources on one site.

We drove from Guelph to Montreal for the WPSA conference. Steve had decided not to attend the PSA meeting as he felt that 6 days of conference was too much at a stretch. It would appear that very few people attended both meetings. Montreal is a beautiful city with a colourful old city on the banks of the St Lawrence River.

The conference venue was excellent and the expo that formed part of the conference was good. Although some of the papers that I attended were good, I felt that too many of the speakers had dusted off some old research and trotted it out for the event. Dr David Sklan presented the one paper that stands out in my mind on the development of the gastro-intestinal tract of the young chick.

Interestingly, the proceedings are all on a CD rather than in book form. The advantage of this is that you can search this database using any number of key words should you need information. The disadvantage is that you can’t really read the paper before the presentation.

I saw a number of very interesting products on display at the expo. The first of these was a system, based on an ion meter, for analysing Calcium, Sodium, Potassium and Chloride. The machinery costs about US$2000.00 and the reagents cost about US 50 cents per sample. Analysis takes about 15 minutes (each sample must be digested). The solutions used do not require any preparation, are non-corrosive and non-hazardous.

The second thing of interest that I found was a product called Soy Chek. By simply adding a small amount of this liquid to a soy sample it is possible to see if it has been adequately processed or not. I have brought some home with me to try out.

Lastly, I was introduced to a product called GroGel which has been designed as a way of preventing the dehydration of day old chicks. In addition it can be used as a vehicle for feeding the USDA approved product called Preempt. Preempt is the first commercially available defined Competitive Exclusion culture. Applied day-of-age to baby chicks, it’s unique blend of 29 beneficial bacteria rapidly colonise the chick’s GI tract, effectively shielding it from Salmonella microbes.

This process, known as Competitive Exclusion, provides the chick with the natural disease resistance of a mature, healthy bird.

 

A demonstration of Soy Chek’s effectiveness. The sample on the left was adequately cooked while that on the right was raw product.

We returned home with memories of sunny, sometimes very hot days, tremendous hospitality and Pooh bear.

Rick Kleyn

Top

Excerpts from the Journal of Applied Poultry Research

 

Can Midnight Feeding Improve Shell Quality in Layers?

Broken and cracked eggs represent a major economic loss on commercial farms. Approximately 6.5% of all eggs produced are unusable because of shell quality problems. Because most eggs are laid in the morning, and because it takes about 20 hours for the hen to form an eggshell, the hen has a large demand for calcium through the night during the period of shell formation. Previous research has shown that the digestive system of the hen has less total calcium during the early morning than in the late afternoon. Little calcium is available to the hen after midnight when most of the eggshell is being formed. This begged the question; "if we ran the lights and the feeders for 45 minutes at midnight, would the hens consume the feed made available to them and would they produce better quality shells?"

Procedures

Three separate field experiments using DeKalb and Hy-Line strains were set up. In each experiment, the effect of running the lights and feeders for 45 minutes at midnight in one house was compared to a control house.

A sample of eggs was collected at 900 h and at 1500 h. The specific gravity and shell weight per unit of surface area were calculated as indicators of shell quality. The hens were given midnight feeding for 4 days in a row and eggs were collected daily for the same 4 days over a number of flock ages.

Results and Conclusions

Shell quality was improved by turning on the lights and feeders for 45 minutes at midnight. This was especially effective for eggs collected at 900 h. This would seem logical as the hens who were fed at midnight had a supply of calcium during the time of heavy demand. Hens who lay their eggs later in the day (1500 h collection) have access to calcium for a greater percent of the time during shell formation.

Harms, R.D., et al., (1996): JAPR 5:1-5.

 

Increased dietary calcium for broiler breeder hens on wire and litter.

It was found that when Broiler Breeders are moved from a floor environment to cages with wire floors that eggshell quality decreased. Increasing the level of dietary calcium from 2.5% to 4.0% with ground limestone or pullet-size limestone did not improve eggshell quality on either surface. This must lead us to question the practice increasing the calcium level in our broiler breeder diets to levels of 3.5% or more.

Kuchinski, K.K. et al., (1998): JAPR 7:162-165

Estimation of the sodium and chloride requirements for the young broiler chick.

Levels of 0.25% Na and 0.20% Cl were required for maximum 21-day weight by male broiler chicks fed a corn-soybean meal type diet. The requirement for older birds (21 to 42 days) was no more than 0.15% Na. Cl levels higher than 0.2% were of no benefit.

Sodium bicarbonate was equal to sodium chloride as a source of Na, but displayed no production advantages during this study.

Litter moisture was directly related to the Na level of the diet but not to Na source. Maintaining a safe minimum level of Na would be beneficial in reducing problems of wet litter.

Na level and Na source had no apparent effect on tibial dyscondroplasia scores.

Cl, but not Na, appeared to have a strong effect on feed intake. Feed conversion was only weakly affected by levels of Na and Cl, suggesting that the greatest effect of minerals was on appetite.

Increasing Cl tended to improve bone ash, while increasing Na appeared to decrease bone ash.

Within the range tested there were no interactions between Na and Cl on any of the parameters examined. This finding suggests that the application of specific Na: Cl ratios in the formulation of practical poultry diets may not be beneficial.

Murakami, A.E., et al. (1997): JAPR 6:128-136 & JAPR 6: 155-162

 

Top

Seasonal Infertility in Sows

 

During summer and early autumn, many pork producers experience a variety of reproductive problems. These problems can be anoestrus, extended or no weaning-to-oestrus intervals, poor conception rates, and higher embryo mortality rates (low farrowing rates). This phenomenon is commonly referred to as "seasonal infertility". In boars one will see lower semen output and quality.

This drop in fertility reduces the number of slaughter pigs available during the 2nd half of the calendar year and constitutes a large reduction in profitability because pork prices are normally higher at that time. Most researchers have attributed this seasonal infertility to two factors—heat stress and the fact that pigs are inherently seasonal breeders. Even though numerous factors may influence sow fertility on a sow farm today, management and environment appear to be the two most influential ones.

Effect of Heat Stress Fertility: In studies where temperatures were elevated experimentally for sows and gilts, anestrus increased while conception rates and embryo survival decreased when temperatures are increased in excess of 280 C. There is also evidence that boars exposed to ambient temperatures in excess of 300 C have lower sperm output and quality. If exposure is short, recovery occurs in 6 to 7 weeks. It takes 6 to 7 weeks for a new group of sperm cells to mature within the boar's testicle and epididymis, and the immature, developing sperm cells tend to be more sensitive than the mature ones.

To determine if pigs are feeling the effect of heat, respiration rate can be monitored when they are in a resting state. Counting the number of times the rib cage moves in and out in a minute can do this. Normal respiration rates for pigs are between 15 and 25 breaths per minute. If respiration rates climb over 60, then the pigs are probably suffering heat stress.

Ventilation and Cooling: The first step in reducing the impact of heat stress on sow fertility is to supply good ventilation. Pigs are more sensitive than humans to the combined effects of heat and relative humidity because they do not sweat. Thus, it is important to consider heat indexes and to adjust the activation temperatures of supplemental cooling systems. It is imperative that supplemental cooling systems are in place in all phases of sow production.

Cooling systems could include evaporative drip or spray cooling and circulating fans. Sprinkling is preferred to fogging, which uses smaller water droplets. Sprinkling cools the skin surface by wetting the skin and allowing the water to evaporate, where fogging cools the air and then the air must cool the skin. Most systems will be designed to operate for a period of 1 to 2 minutes up to 4 times per hour.

Another effective method to cool sows during lactation is the installation of nose coolers. Tubes can be connected to the air inlet and directed to the bottom of the farrowing crate near the sow's nose while she is lying down. This supplies constant air movement across her face when the ventilation system is activated.

Changing Photoperiods: Other research has shown that gradual reductions in day length (photoperiod) may possibly reduce fertility. These studies looked at pigs kept in a constant, thermoneutral environment and measured fertility by farrowing rate and litter size. But the stimulatory influence of photoperiod on sow reproductive performance has not been consistently proven, and most results from these studies suggest that temperature has a greater effect than photoperiod.

Sow Mortality: It is not uncommon for sow mortality to double during the summer months because heat stress is added to the already stressful condition of farrowing and lactation.

In many operations the bulk of sow mortality occurs within the first 30 days following parturition. There are no specific interventions to lower the incidence of mortality during periods of elevated temperatures.

Feeding: Without question, getting sows to keep eating as much as they need or to prevent a drop-off in their consumption during the summer months is the most critical management step for reducing the impact of heat stress on seasonal infertility. Here are some ways to accomplish it:

Increase Feeding Frequency. When producers switch from feeding two times per day to three times per day, most experience a 10 to 15 percent increase in sow feed intake. The reason this works is related to the normal increase in body temperature that occurs after a sow consumes a meal. More meals are very important for sows whose body temperatures already may be in the upper end of the thermoneutral range.
Keep Feed Fresh. Sows tend to be picky eaters compared to most animals. In warm conditions, feed is more likely to spoil. Increasing the feeding frequency in conjunction with feeding smaller meals is an excellent way to keep feed fresh.
Wet Feeding. Success with this strategy may vary greatly among operations, but it has been reported to boost sow feed intake by as much as 15 percent. One drawback is that wet feed does not stay fresh in the trough for very long.
Adding Fat to the Diet. As a result of poor feed intake, many sows are not able to meet the metabolic demands of lactation and may fall into a negative energy balance. This factor probably accounts for most of the reproductive disorders during periods of elevated temperatures. One way ensure that sows are consuming enough energy, even though they are eating a smaller quantity of feed, is to add fat to the lactation diet.

Give Water Constantly. High ambient temperatures will increase water requirements, particularly for sows. Increased water consumption coupled with increased urinary water loss is one mechanism by which pigs lose body heat. An increase in temperature from 15° C to 32° C will double the sows' water demand (Sows may drink up to 40l of water daily). One rule of thumb to follow is a water-to-feed ratio of 5:1.

Any watering system should deliver a minimum of 1 litre per minute and ideally 2 litres per minute. Sows will quickly become frustrated if the flow rate is low, and this will reduce their appetite for dry feed. Water temperature and quality are also important. During periods of high temperatures, pigs will consume almost double the quantity of cool water (10º C) as warm water (27º C).

Reducing Embryo Mortality during Periods of Heat Stress: Prenatal mortality may be as high as 40 percent in pigs. The bulk of this embryo loss occurs during the first two to three weeks following breeding. Factors associated with embryo loss include stage of pregnancy, disease, age of dam, genetic factors, nutrition, external environment, intrauterine environment, and stress—including heat stress.

When pigs are under extreme heat-related stress during the first 30 days following breeding, it is imperative that the following recommendations be put into effect to avoid increased embryo mortality:

(1) Avoid late oestrual inseminations: A postbreeding inflammatory response occurs in the uterus of the pig in the removal of non-fertilising spermatozoa and bacteria The simplest way to prevent late oestrual inseminations is to ignore the "target" number of inseminations and breed females totally on the basis of a strong, standing heat response. Another way to reduce mistimed inseminations is to determine the average oestrus length in your weaned sows, gilts, and repeat breeders and based on these averages, shorten the last insemination interval up.

(2) Minimise unnecessary stress by mixing females only at weaning. Embryo implantation does not occur until day 13 and full attachment not until day 18. During this time, the pig is highly susceptible to stress factors, such as movement and temperature. If females are to be mixed, this should be performed on the day of weaning to prevent unnecessary stress on the female,

(3) Refrain from or even stop moving females in gestation to different locations: After breeding and around day 30 of pregnancy, females may be moved to a different location; however, mixing sows and gilts at any time during or following breeding greatly increases the chances of subsequent embryo mortality. Temperature changes also are likely to increase embryo mortality.

(4) Provide a good, level plane of nutrition following during and after breeding. The pre-mating nutritional status appears to be a greater determinant of embryo numbers and survival than post-mating diet in gilts. Using this strategy requires "flushing" them with extra feed during the oestrus cycle before mating. Another consideration in managing embryo survival rates is to avoid high feed intakes during the 30 days following breeding.

 

Lactation Lengths

The greatest metabolic demand on the sow is during lactation. Many postweaning reproductive abnormalities can be attributed to low feed intake and depletion of fat reserves in the lactating sow. Possible strategies to reduce nutritional requirements and maintain body condition include a shorter lactation period, cross-fostering to balance litter size and split weaning.

Genetic Components

Several gilt studies have clearly demonstrated that backfat depths of less than 12.5 mm are associated with reproductive inefficiencies. However, reduced reproductive performance is also consistently reported in females having more than 26 to 30mm of fat when they are introduced into the herd. In short, there appears to be an optimal gilt body condition range for introduction to the breeding herd that is dependent on genetic line.

 

Adapted from an article by Kevin Rozeboom, Todd See, Billy Flowers North Carolina

Top

Phytase Update

 

We have reported on phytase in the past, but thought it good to do so again since its use has expanded to include layers, broilers and pigs. We will also give some more information on the available products and how they should be used.

Phytate Phosphorus: More than two thirds of the phosphorus present in the seeds of many vegetable feedstuffs is bound in the form of phytate phosphorus. This compound is regarded as the main storage form of phosphorus in seeds. In addition to phosphorus, other bivalent cations such as calcium, magnesium, iron and zinc, as well as proteins and amino acids are bound to phytate.

Monogastric animals lack the necessary enzymes to completely utilise phytate phosphorus. Depending on the feedstuffs, only 18 and 40% of the P is digested. A phytase enzyme increases digestibility and utilisation of the total phosphorus contained in vegetable ingredients, making more phosphorus available for absorption in the small intestine. This means that less supplementation of the feed with mineral phosphorus is necessary to meet the animal's phosphorus requirements without adversely affecting the performance or skeletal mineralisation.

Phytate hydrolysis: In order for phytate phosphorus to be utilised it must first be hydrolysed to inorganic phosphorus within the digestive tract. With maize-based diets the amounts hydrolysed were 0%, 3% and 8% respectively for four and nine-week-old broiler chickens, and laying birds. When wheat and maize-based diets were used, these figures increased to 8%, 13% and 13%. Although phytate phosphorus is generally poorly used, some digestion and utilisation does occur. This can be as much as half of total phytate.

Phytate binds other nutrients: Phytic acid shows strong chelating properties as a result of its structure. It forms a variety of complexes with cations, such as calcium, magnesium, copper, zinc and iron, and with proteins, rendering these nutrients biologically unavailable.

Although calcium has the lowest binding affinity the greatest impact of phytate on mineral nutrition, other than P is on calcium availability. It also has an effect on Zinc, Copper and a number of other trace minerals. Dietary calcium content and the calcium: phytate ratio may be important factors that determine the extent of phytate hydrolyses. Excess dietary calcium can progressively precipitate all the phytate by forming an insoluble calcium phytate complex in the intestine. The result of the reaction is that the phytate phosphorus as well as the calcium becomes largely unavailable for absorption. High contents of dietary calcium and magnesium are known to reduce intestinal phytase activity in chicks. Only a few studies have investigated the influence of calcium (calcium: phosphorus ratio) on the efficacy of phytase in broiler diets.

Phytate -protein interactions: The occurrence of protein-phytate complexes reduces the availability of proteins to the bird. It appears that phytate-protein complexes are more resistant to proteolytic digestion than the protein alone. The interaction between phytic acid and proteins is thought to be pH dependent and leads to decreased protein solubility. In turn, certain functional properties of the protein can be adversely affected because they depend on hydration and solubility. Some workers have reported that a phytic acid - protein interaction reduced the availability of legume protein and that the protein source is an important factor.

The bottom-line. All the above factors is that phytase research continues to focus on improving phosphorus digestibility, but that the benefits to digestibility of other nutrients may improve the cost effectiveness of this enzyme.

The use of phytase in animal agriculture: Studies by Cabahug et al., 1999, Sebastian, 1997 and Zanella 1999, showed that supplemental phytase improved weight gain and food efficiency of broilers, but the magnitude of the responses was greater in low non-phytate phosphorus diets, resulting in significant non-phytate phosphorus X phytase interactions. This would imply that phytase could be administered to broiler diets.

Van der Klis (1996) concluded from the results of two long-term experiments with laying hens, that 0.12% available phosphorus was not adequate to satisfactorily maintain egg production performance. However the addition of 0,06% P from monocalcium phosphate or adding 200 units phytase/kg diet overcame all signs of the P deficiency.

Supplementation of pig diets with microbial phytase is effective in restoring growth performance of growing- finishing pigs fed diets containing reduced levels of inorganic P. This result was brought about by an approximate 30% increase in P digestibility of the diet. Phytase supplementation has also shown improved calcium, copper, phosphorus and zinc utilisation.

The level of Ca in the diets may also affect the utilisation of phytic acid – P through the formation of insoluble calcium phytate and/or reduction of phytase activity.

The phytase products available in South Africa are the following:

  1. Natuphos - BASF
  2. Rhonozyme - Roche
  3. Allzyme phytase – Alltech

The difference between these products is that different microbial organisms are used to produce the phytase. Natuphos is a phytase source obtained by the fermentation of an Aspergillus niger strain, and Rhonozyme of Peniophora lycii. Allzyme also makes use of an Aspergillus niger fermentation. This product is not yet commercially available.

 

Product

Rate of use (g)

[]

Pigs

Broilers

Layers

Natuphos

5000 FTU/g

100

100

60

Natuphos

10000 FTU/g

50

50

30

Rhonozyme

2500 FYT/g

300

300

180

Allzyme

11500 ptu/g

1000

1000

1000

 

Product

MCP sparing effect (kg/ton)

Maximum pelleting temp

Cost/kg of enzyme (R/kg)

Cost of enzyme/ ton of layer feed

Natuphos 5000

± 5

65 °C

130

7.65

Natuphos 10000

± 5

65 °C

220

6.60

Rhonozyme

± 5.5

85 °C

37

6.73

Allzyme

40 %

85 °C

Not available

Not available

 

Christél Coetzee

 

SPESFEED cc

Animal Nutrition Consultants

SPESFEED NEWS is published by SPESFEED cc. The purpose of the newsletter is two fold. It serves both as a source of information for those involved in animal agriculture as well as a means for us to maintain contact with out clients.

SPESFEED provides a professional technical service to the livestock and animal feed industries. Our aim is to ensure that our clients use optimal production and feeding systems in order to maximise the return on investment. The company has no affiliation to any particular product or supplier.