
Published by: SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd, P O Box 48, Rivonia, 2128. Tel: (011) 803-2050, Fax: (011) 803-8201
| Inside This Issue |
| Evaluating Alternative Feed Ingredients in Broiler Diets |
| What type of Mills should we use? |
The past summer season has been somewhat unique. It has been characterised by higher than average rainfall, but lower than normal maize plantings. This will result in a smaller than normal crop that has put maize prices under some upwards pressure.
Thus, the editor becomes a
contributor in this edition.
Poultry Nutrition
Course
The
SPESFEED Poultry Nutrition Course will be held from the 18th until
the 20th of September at the Country Club, Woodmead.
The
course covers the following aspects:
|
Basic
nutrition of protein and energy | |
|
Practical
aspects of vitamin and mineral nutrition. | |
|
Details
discussion on the nutrition and feeding management of laying hens, broilers
and broiler breeders. | |
|
The
basic concepts of feed ingredients selection and feed formulation. |
The
cost of the course is R 1950.00 per person (excluding VAT).
This fee includes a copy of the SPESFEED book ‘Commercial Poultry
Nutrition in
Commercial Poultry Nutrition
SPESFEED Feed
Formulation Program
I believe that we have managed
to retain the logic and functionality (the look and feel) of the DOS version of
the software fairly well. There have
been some significant advances in the way in which the data is managed and
displayed, much of which has to do with the new operating system.
For example, it is possible to sort and display data in any order.
The aspect of SPESFEED EXPRESS
that pleases me in particular,
is the way in which the formulation screen has evolved.
Although it looks a little busy, it is possible to change specifications,
ingredient limits and costs, round the solution and examine the sensitivity and
ranging data all on a single screen. This
replaces 6 screen’s worth of information in the old DOS version of the
program.
New Book
I
recently came upon a new book on poultry nutrition on the internet.
It is entitled ‘Poultry Nutrition and Feeding’ and was written by
G.M. Pesti, R.I. Bakalli, J.P. Driver, A. Atencio, and E.H. Foster of the
The
book is published by Trafford Publishing (www.trafford.com)
and costs US$ 60.00. The aspect that
I found most interesting is that when I ordered myself a copy, I received an
e-mail telling me that my book would be ‘printed soon’.
In short, here is a publishing company that only prints the book once
they have received an order.
World Broiler
Production
The
USDA has just published its latest broiler production figures (March 2006) and I
have included some of these results.
The two tables below show the situation in
Table
1: Broiler meat production and consumption in
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
Production |
803 |
805 |
822 |
836 |
|
Importation |
125 |
154 |
175 |
190 |
|
Consumption |
928 |
959 |
997 |
1026 |
Table
2: Consumption in the global market (in 1000 metric tons, ready to cook
equivalent)
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
|
9963 |
9931 |
10150 |
10235 |
|
European
Union |
7312 |
7280 |
7370 |
7270 |
|
|
5742 |
5992 |
6622 |
7135 |
|
|
12540 |
13080 |
13455 |
13878 |
|
Total |
52880 |
54175 |
56906 |
58912 |
As can be seen consumption in
South
Total African production is
about 4.1 mil tons, which means that
Ethics in
Agriculture
I
have written about ethical behaviour and the way in which we conduct ourselves
as professional and business people in the past.
A recent publication has revealed that agricultural extension
workers believe that ethics do not impact on their daily activities and that the
ethics of agricultural practice is not a routine concern.
In the October 2005 edition of
the Journal of Extension, Prof Robert Zimdahl
of
It was found that whether ethical implications of
actions are considered, is largely related to profitability. If an action has
positive economic implications (profit), ethical consideration is appropriate.
However, if anticipated economic outcomes will be unsatisfactory, then ethical
questions are not considered. For extension workers (and consultants), ethics
and economics go together, but economic outcomes tend to be the primary concern.
In broad terms, it was accepted that sustainable
agriculture is key. Sustainability
applies to the environment, family farms, animal rights, and food safety.
Sustainable agriculture must be economically viable, environmentally
sound, and socially acceptable. It also needs to be politically achievable.
If sustainable agricultural systems are not achieved, the resources
available for future generations will not be sufficient to produce enough food.
If future generations do not have adequate food, then those involved in
agriculture could be held accountable for lack of moral foresight (ethics?). In
addition to producing sufficient food, a sustainable system would help preserve
local communities and encourage environmental stewardship.
Perhaps it is time to extend ethics to include all
aspects of our business. The recent
issue of the water inclusion in broiler products may well be a case in point.
Rick
Kleyn
At
the 2005 Bannf Pork seminar, a paper dealing with the true metabolic
availability of amino acids in pig diets was presented. The rationale behind
this technique is that not all of the dietary amino acid as measured by the
standardised ileal digestibility method is available for protein synthesis and
the ileal digestibility is not always an accurate measure of performance.
The
technique involves using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Briefly, if a dietary amino acid (lysine) is limiting protein synthesis,
then all other amino acids are in excess and must be oxidized. Phenylalanine was
chosen as an indicator of the partitioning of these excess amino acids between
oxidation and protein synthesis. Thus, when dietary lysine is deficient, the
phenylalanine cannot be incorporated into protein and the excess must be
oxidized. As dietary lysine is increased, more phenylalanine is incorporated
into protein and less is oxidized. Once lysine is increased above its
requirement, then phenylalanine oxidation remains constant because increasing
amounts of lysine do not lead to increases in protein synthesis. The dietary
lysine level at which phenylalanine oxidation changes from a decreasing pattern
to a constant pattern, is called the breakpoint and is equivalent to the lysine
requirement.
Phenylalanine oxidation reflects
protein synthesis, which in turn is dependent on the lysine metabolically
available for incorporation into protein. Thus, phenylalanine oxidation reflects
‘metabolically available’ lysine and does not require any assumptions or
require any indirect calculations regarding dietary digestibility’s or
endogenous losses specific to feedstuffs. Therefore, metabolically available
lysine can be calculated from phenylalanine oxidation, provided the animal is
fed lysine at a level that is deficient, or within the decreasing phase of
oxidation.
Although the hypothesis has been tested and the technique validated for use with different feedstuffs, several methodological considerations exist that needed to be addressed and validated before the final form of the technique is acceptable.
Figure
1. Indicator amino acid oxidation response to increasing intake of limiting
amino acid.

These would include:
|
Length of adaptation period
on diet to achieve a steady state in amino acid oxidation and protein
synthesis. | |
|
How repeatable are the
measurements? | |
|
What is the metabolic
availability of the indicator and is this major problem? |
The next step to validate this
technique is to directly compare batches of feedstuffs using the ileal
digestibility technique and our new metabolic availability approach. One
limitation is that batch to batch variability in feedstuffs in amino acid
content and availability is significant and prevents an accurate comparison of
the methods.
Based on the success of the method
in pigs, studies are currently underway to develop this methodology for poultry.
The basic methodology has already been validated (Tabiri et al., 2002a, 2002b,
Coleman et al., 2003).
Ball, Moehn and Bertolo
Evaluating
Alternative Feed Ingredients in Broiler Diets
As
our broiler production systems become more intensive and more competitive, we
continually need to evaluate what we are currently doing and explore new
opportunities. Before any decision with regards to any ingredient can be made,
it is essential
that the nutritionist knows everything there is to know about it.
This means that the nutrient content should be known, that the physical
structure or form of the ingredient is correct, that the processing has been
such that the nutrient bio-availability has not been negatively impacted and
that the biological quality of the ingredient in terms of any possible pathogen
or toxin contamination, can be assured.
Once
satisfied that you have complete knowledge of an ingredient, the economic value
of the ingredient can be determined. Traditionally, there are three aspects that determine the value of an
ingredient, these being the price and nutrient content of the ingredient itself,
the price and availability of the other ingredients and lastly, the diet in
which it is to be used.
By making use of the ranging/sensitivity features of a standard feed
formulation program it is easy to determine the value of any ingredient in any
specific product.
By extension, Multi-Mix® (Format International) technology gives the
nutritionist the ability to determine the value of an ingredient across a whole
range of products, bearing the volumes of feed that are to be made and the
ingredient availability in mind.
Evaluating
ingredients using standard linear programming (LP) does have a major
shortcoming. LP
generates a ‘least cost’ diet for a certain pre-determined feed
specification.
It does not look at the overall profitability of the broiler production
process. Opportunities
may well be lost if the nutritionist ignores bird response to nutrients, in
particular nutrient density, and it is this aspect that needs to be added to our
methodology of ingredient evaluation.

Figure
1: Response in body weight gain and FCR in male broilers to incremental levels
of nutrient density, after Saleh et al.
(2004)
By making use of a standard feed formulation program, the ideal amino acid profile as published by Lemme et al., (2004), standard ingredient costs and an estimated value for a live broiler, it is possible to calculate the return at the different energy densities. This can be seen in the ‘Standard’ line in (figure 2).
Whilst this data is useful, it was determined using very low bird stocking densities (10 birds/m2). The work of Berri et al, (2004) demonstrates clearly that at higher stocking densities birds respond to nutrients, total lysine in this case, in a different manner. The consequences of this are that often experimental data may not apply to commercial conditions. Where stocking densities are higher the expected growth on lower density diets may well be over-estimated.
By
making use of the data published by Saleh
et al. (2004) and the same iterative
methodology as described above, it is possible to illustrate exactly how
ingredient availability or price will interact with nutrient density.
To this end, it was assumed that a) relatively cheap Sunflower Meal and
b) relatively cheap Full Fat Soya become available.

Figure
2:
Return per broiler at incremental nutrient densities, for standard diets
(- -), diets with sunflower meal, (_ _ _) and diets with FFS (___).
The
results of this evaluation (Figure 2) illustrate that should sunflower be
available, it may well pay the nutritionist to reduce nutrient densities.
On the other hand, should FFS become freely available, it will pay to use
more dense diets.
Rick Kleyn
What Type of Mills should we use?
Hammer Mills: This
has been the standard for producing pig feed, both commercially and on farm.
Hammer mills do the best job of reducing barley to a size that limits
impact on feed density, flow rate and solids accumulation in pits and lagoons.
Screen opening and the condition of the screens and hammers determines
the particle size of the processed feed. As mills become more automated, the
option of changing screens for different ages or classes of pigs becomes
prohibitive, so a median selection is often used for all rations. Hammer mills
have the lowest initial cost.
Roller Mills: Roller
mills are widely used for producing cattle rations and more recently roller
mills have become increasingly popular for controlled reduction of maize and
wheat for pig and poultry rations. Capital cost is higher than for hammer mills,
and they are considered more energy efficient.
When one considers rollers are used on feed grains that are more
‘brittle’, this benefit can be discounted. Their main advantage is the
controlled reduction of the grain to a desired particle size with greater
consistency and equipment durability.
Disc
Mills: The
disc mill is a recently introduced European option for particle reduction.
The grain is introduced to a
chamber between one stationary disc and one revolving disc. The grain is crushed
as it moves from the center to the outside of the chamber, through reducing
clearance between the discs. Adjusting
the distance between the two discs controls the particle size, and this can be
automated to allow different clearances for different feed grains in the ration.
Stirdon
Systems,
Nutrient Density and Broiler Breeders
The debate over what feed specifications
should be used for broiler breeders, continues.
Recently, Enting (2005), has published a paper in which diets of
different nutrient densities were used. It
was found that low density diets can affect the development of the reproductive
tract, egg production, egg size, composition, embryonic development and the
ultimate performance of the broiler – in a positive way.
Six
replicates of Cobb 500 breeding hens were used in each of 3 dietary treatment.
Diets which included 10.88 MJ/kg of energy during the grower phase and 11.72
MJ/kg during lay, were taken as the standard.
In treatments 2 and 3 the ME content was lowered by 1.26 and 2.51 MJ/kg
respectively, by making use of low density feed ingredients.
All other nutrients were reduced to the same extent as the ME content.
During
the rearing period, no significant differences in liveweight were observed and
the target weight of 2550 g was reached. Although not significant, the lowest
energy diet resulted in the lowest ovary and oviduct weights at 24 weeks of age.
However, during the period 24 to 26 weeks, there were significant increases in
the rate of development of the ovary and oviduct in the birds fed low density
diets.
Table:
Effect of diet density on egg production parameters and chick weight.
|
ME
(MJ/kg) |
11.72 |
10.46 |
9.2 |
|
Feed
Intake (g/hen/day) |
156.5a |
176.2b |
199.9c |
|
Production
(%) |
57.7a |
60.2b |
58ab |
|
Egg
Weight (g) |
65.4a |
65.9ab |
66.5b |
|
Chick
weight -29 wks (g) |
35.9 |
|
36.3 |
|
Chick
weight -41 wks (g) |
41.8a |
|
42.8b |
From
the next table it can be seen that nutrient density had an impact on the growth
and livability of the offspring.
Table: Effect of diet density growth
rate and mortality of offspring.
|
ME
(MJ/kg) |
11.72 |
10.46 |
9.2 |
|
Week 29 |
|
|
|
|
Liveweight
38 days (g) |
2125a |
2185b |
2131a |
|
Mortality
0-38 days (%) |
3.3 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
|
Week 41 |
|
|
|
|
Liveweight
38 days (g) |
2336 |
2345 |
2332 |
|
Mortality
0-38 days (%) |
3.0 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
|
Week 60 |
|
|
|
|
Liveweight
38 days (g) |
2257 |
2262 |
2280 |
|
Mortality
0-38 days (%) |
5.4b |
3.7ab |
3.5b |
In
earlier work conducted by Smulders and Enting, it was found that
reduced nutrient levels in broiler breeder feeds led to a significant
reduction in heterophil/lymphocyte ratios at six weeks of age, indicating that
the birds were less stressed in physiological terms.
The
eminent Dr Colin Fisher has said that ‘any improvements in broiler breeder
nutrition in future, are likely to be made through improving feeding programs
rather than through changed or improved dietary specifications’.
These data serve to illustrate this point.
Clearly, breeder hens are able to perform adequately over a huge range of
nutrient densities, and what happens on the farm is more important that what
feed specifications are used.
H Enting,
Schothorst Feed Research
The
While
large corporations have specific budgets and departments to address
communication issues within their businesses, this is not a privilege accorded
to the SME business owner and subsequently –
due to priority constraints – gets overlooked more often than is healthy.
There
are two primary areas on which the SME owner should concentrate:
The
global information trend has not left anyone unaffected, much less semi-literate
or unskilled workers. Across all
industries we are noting a desire to be better informed, both about the
individual’s basic jobs and functions, and about the company for which they
work in general. Employees not only
want to know what they must do, but HOW they must do it and how their actions
fit into the bigger picture. Recognising
this paradigm shift leads to more effective and better received and interpreted
communication.
I
call it the TBMB? scenario: whatever
the company does, whatever the individual is asked to do, the subliminal
question is ‘this benefits me because??’. Once
this question is addressed, an employee is open to buy -in of required
adherences. An employer can, for
example, instruct staff to dry the floor immediately after washing – and leave
it at that. The result at worst will
probably be non-compliance: the
instruction makes no sense and may be perceived as unnecessary (Diagram block 1
or 2). At best, there will be some compliance, but a non-committed, conscious
form, in other words ‘I am doing this because I am being told to, but it makes
no sense to me’.
|
Level
2: Conscious Non Compliance: “I am not obeying the instruction because I
have decided not to. It makes
no sense to me.” |
Level
3: Conscious Compliance: “I understand why I must do it so I will try to
remember”. |
|
Level
1: Unconscious non compliance.“ I’m not obeying the instruction but I
don’t even realise it”. |
Level
4: Unconscious Compliance “I do the right thing automatically.
I don’t have to think about it.” |
Imagine,
now, the scenario where the same instruction is given but more information is
added: ‘if the floor remains wet, it will encourage he growth of bacteria.
This could spread amongst the stock and cause a serious loss.
Loss of stock means loss of income and will lead to loss of jobs.
This could affect you and the people who rely on you for an income.’
At
this stage, you are likely to reach a level of conscious compliance, until the
employee absorbs and accepts the meaningfulness of the instruction, puts it into
practice, and starts performing the task automatically, at which stage we reach
level 4: Unconscious Compliance.
Not
only does this lead to greater productivity, but establishes a greater sense of
security in the employee who understands why he is doing something and through
this understanding, becomes voluntarily accepting. This theory can be broadly
applied whether one is looking at industrial safety, or issues such as HIV/Aids,
contagious disease outbreaks or issues surrounding Bird flu.
After
a period of time, this way of thinking becomes inherent in the employee and one
invariably finds employees becoming aware of other factors which might influence
their effectiveness at work – they start adhering to tea times, picking up
papers and attending meetings.
Communications
Never assume that because you have written something on a board or a piece of paper, or uttered the words of an instruction, that you have succeeded in communicating. Communication only works when it has been understood, absorbed, accepted by and responded to by the person with whom we are hoping to communicate. It works to go back to basics. Ask the person to express their understanding or interpretation of your communication, clarify where necessary and then explain WHY the instruction or message is important.We
are creative beings, no matter how much we try to tell ourselves we aren’t.
Use some of this creativity in your communications to make them more memorable and create a greater impact.
This will make employees more ready, able and willing to understand what
you want them to. Print messages
about leave changes on the feed
bucket, let the staff struggle to put on their gumboots because you have put a
crunched up message inside saying ‘deadlines are getting tighter’.
A ‘thank you’ on a chocolate medal presented at tea time will go a
long way towards understanding of the reward and adherence to operation
prerequisites in future.
Karin
Petersen specialises in innovative brand building and effective communication
for small and medium enterprises. She
can be contact on karpet@iafrica.com or
082 375 4083.
|
SPESFEED
(Pty) Ltd. |
|
Animal
Nutrition Consultants SPESFEED NEWS
is
published by the consultants at SPESFEED (Pty) Ltd. The purpose of the
newsletter is two fold. It
serves both as a source of information for those involved in animal
agriculture as well as a means for us to maintain contact with out
clients. SPESFEED provides a professional
technical service to the livestock and animal feed industries.
Our aim is to ensure that our clients use optimal production and
feeding systems in order to maximise the return on investment.
The company has no affiliation to any particular product or
supplier. P. O. Box 48 Rivonia
2128 South
Africa
Tel
+ 27 11 803 2050 |